Lift for Life wrote:
For many "natural" athletes it would seem that the word "natural" is synonymous with "legal". But then again,, how would you define "natural"?
Excellent point. In fact, many "natural" bodybuilders were using prohormones before the various federations started banning them.
Right, I suppose I'm trying to define the term "natural" as it *should* apply to bodybuilding. Just because one is using something that occurs in nature, doesn't make him/her a natural. Stallone is using testosterone injections. I would not call him natural, even though testosterone is clearly present in nature (in all our bodies). I'm definitely a purist, but IMO, one loses their "natural" status when they use something that makes them more muscular than they could become with their good diet and hard training. That's not to say that I disrespect those that choose to use creatine or other such supplements that are safe. (I *do* disrespect those that continue to ruin bodybuilding's image by using enormous amounts of anabolic steroids, HGH, insulin, etc. -- i.e. almost all IFBB pros.)