Friday, February 10, 2012
Articles Training Articles Bodyweight Exercise vs Free Weights vs Machines

New Poll

How long are your cardio sessions?
 


Bodyweight Exercise vs Free Weights vs Machines PDF Print E-mail
(75 votes, average 2.16 out of 5)
Written by Tamir Katz   

Bodyweight Exercise vs. Free Weights vs. MachinesBodyweight Exercise vs. Free Weights vs. Machines 


 

In this article, I am going to be discussing the merits and drawbacks of exercising with free weights, including barbells, dumbbells, sandbags, or other weighted objects, bodyweight exercises, which include calisthenics and gymnastics, and machines, which include both weight machines and aerobic machines such as treadmills and step machines. Let's start off with what you hope to achieve from your workouts, and we'll correlate your goals with what kind of workouts you should be doing.

 

Unfortunately, the trend nowadays at most gyms is towards "cosmetic" workouts, where a trainee will simply try to acquire blown up biceps and a large chest without caring about the development of the legs, back, neck, as well as the functionality of his body. By functionality, I mean the ability to use the body for purposes other than the means by which it acquired the strength or stamina. For example, our trainee back there who pumps up his arms on machines, probably cannot do a heck of a lot more with his body now than before he started working out, other than push more weights on the arm machine. Thus his workouts are not functional. On the other hand, a trainee who lifts and carries heavy sandbags has functional strength which he can use when lifting, carrying, or moving other heavy things such as furniture, heavy luggage, boxes, etc.
 

This is the primary reason machines are pretty useless. They have no crossover benefit to real life situations. No balance is required when pushing a handle on a machine, and so all of the accessory muscles, tendons, and ligaments that come into play in real life situations are not being worked. Furthermore, machines tend to isolate muscle groups. A gym will typically have a circuit of machines set up where one works the chest, one the quadriceps, one the shoulders, one the triceps, and so on and so forth. However, in virtually no real life situations do muscles work in isolation. Whether one is throwing a ball, punching someone, kicking, pushing, jumping, or running, many muscles are working together.


Machine based exercise

Machine based workouts also emphasize going slowly "to take all of the momentum out of the lift." Once again, in virtually no real life situations do we move slowly. Did Muhammad Ali throw slow punches? Did Nolan Ryan throw the fastball as slow as he could? Did Michael Jordan slowly make his way to the basket to dunk? Of course not. Speed is essential in most activities. You don't want to be teaching your muscles to work slowly.
 

The aerobic based machines are also usually harmful. Step machines, ski machines, and exercise bicycles all involve repeating the same motion along the same track thousands of times, which can lead to overuse injuries involving the knees, hips, feet, and back. It is preferential to sprint outside on hills or grass, where every step is slightly different, and by virtue of the intensity of the workout, one cannot continue it for long periods of time due to fatigue.
 

So, are there any benefits to using machines? Yes - they do have limited uses. For example, when rehabilitating an injury where you cannot support a barbell, dumbbells, or your own bodyweight, a machine might be used. Similarly, an injured leg might be rehabilitated on an exercise bicycle. The only non-injury related use for machines I can think of is running sprints on a treadmill. Again, sprinting outside is better, since on a machine your acceleration into the sprint is limited by how fast the machine adjusts the speed, but for those that absolutely cannot get outside, the treadmill is an acceptable alternative.
 

Let's move on to the bodyweight vs. free weights debate. Bodyweight exercises are superior for wrestling and other grappling and martial arts, gymnastics, and for those who want to join the armed forces. Weight training is superior for brute strength, football, lifting competitions, and many of the sports. However, when training for other sports, free weights should be combined with sprints, some bodyweight exercises, as well as sport specific drills.
 

Why are bodyweight exercises superior for grappling, combat, and gymnastics? For several reasons. First of all, in each of those activities one needs the ability to use a muscle group over and over again at high levels - that is, muscular endurance, which is developed very well by bodyweight exercises like squats, push-ups, sit-ups, etc. Second, each of those events requires body awareness.
 

I define body awareness literally as being aware of every part of your body at any given point in time in any given position. The problem with weight lifting exercises, even the good ones like snatches, cleans, jerks, or bent pressing, is that you use "weight awareness" - that is, you have to be aware of where the weight is at all times more than where your body is. As long as the weight is lifted and caught in the correct position(s), the body will naturally follow suit (or else the lift fails).
 

However, bodyweight exercises take the weights out of the equation. To successfully do such challenging exercises as handstand push-ups, one-legged squats, headstands, and bridges, you have to be focusing on every part of your body. That is why they are so good for wrestling, and other combat sports where your body is in many different positions during a match, and to be able to successfully recover and counter attack, you must have full awareness of where each part of your body is at all times. Similarly, in gymnastics, where you flip and end up in many different positions, body awareness is crucial.
 

Not all bodyweight exercises develop body awareness equally. Some of the ones I mentioned above such as handstand push-ups and bridging do a very good job, but regular push-ups on the other hand develop it to a lesser extent. The more a bodyweight exercise requires agility and balance, the more body awareness it develops.
 

Bodyweight exercises are also good for people always on the road, those without money to purchase weights, and those with very little time, as a set of push-ups or squats can be squeezed in at odd moments during the day.
 

So what are weights good for? Many things! Nothing packs muscle on a skinny frame like heavy, intense lifting. Nothing is better for increasing brute strength and power - the kind used to lift a heavy box, open a jar that's stuck, tackle a 210 pound running back running at the speed of light, smash a homerun over the Green Monster at Fenway Park, or throw the discus record distances. However, you should choose useful exercises that work many muscles at the same time, exercises such as cleans, snatches, jerks, presses, squats, and deadlifts, using barbells, dumbbells, or sandbags.
 

Let's sum it all up. Use machines very sparingly. They have poor crossover to real life activities. Use a predominantly bodyweight exercise regimen when training for such activities as wrestling and combat sports in general, gymnastics, diving, acrobatics, and the military, where you have to use muscles again and again and need highly developed body awareness, or simply if you're always on the road or have very little time. Use a predominantly free weight exercise regimen for most other sports and activities, but include some bodyweight exercises, and no matter what kind of activity you're engaged in, sprinting in all its forms will enhance your athleticism and fitness.
 

 

Comments  

 
+2 # sangos 2010-05-25 14:09
Great article TK...in India traditional wrestlers follow very core functional bodyweight/weight routines. Even dumbbell movements are very core engaging max muscles and 'body awareness' to borrow your great term :-) ..Thnks again for this great comparison write.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # tom smith 2010-06-16 00:03
u are so stupid just to test your "weight-lifting" superiorty go try to do a one-arm handstand pushup for 20 reps then try 100 one-arm pushups then just to kill you cause this gives you super massive strength go try even 1 one-arm pullup oh then after you have admitted defeat go read about the spartans or eugen sandhow
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Eddie 2010-09-12 18:48
to tom smith:

No your an idiot...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Tubbei 2010-11-23 08:06
Hey Tamir, tx a bunch. You've done a great job explaining things clearly.

I've long been confused by the bodyweight vs. free weight debate, primarily because I have a set of friends who swear by each in turn.

More importantly, I've found that my body burns fat much more easily when I'm hoisting iron, than when I'm doing body weight stuff ... even gymnastic exercise which really build strength.

And it's so much simpler to do 3 sets of 6 heavy-duty weighted squats than 200 hindu squats. But now I know what I'm sacrificing if I choose the former over the latter...
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Jay Jay 2010-12-22 11:17
I like what you said about doing 3 heavy sets instead of hundreds of reps on calisthenics. I really wish scientist would conduct a study on this. I like to lift for a few weeks then do calisthenics for a few weeks. I found that no matter how many pull ups/ push ups I do I still feel weak and during the weight training periods I feel slightly unbalanced and I get tired easier even when I do cardio. Its like my muscles are acting as brakes.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Wade Wilson 2011-01-10 15:13
Machine based workouts also emphasize going slowly "to take all of the momentum out of the lift." Once again, in virtually no real life situations do we move slowly. Did Muhammad Ali throw slow punches? Did Nolan Ryan throw the fastball as slow as he could? Did Michael Jordan slowly make his way to the basket to dunk? Of course not. Speed is essential in most activities. You don't want to be teaching your muscles to work slowly.

Momentum makes work outs less effictive and by going slow there's less momentum helping u lift the weight thus more of the muscle is being worked over a longer peirod of time helping with endurance and strength. If you do everything fast up and down your loseing your negtive reps aswell as working one part of a muscle. My friend doses this and when he flexs it's like a golf ball on his arm a vainy golf ball wile mine the whole length of my arm rises when I flex and I beat him in fights all the time
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-4 # Alex Russell 2011-01-31 17:46
This is an absolutely fantastic article and will contribute well to my football training regime, thanks! :lol:
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Josh Redmon 2011-02-07 09:54
I'm thirteen,I live in China and i want to become a Navy SEAL. My max in push-ups is about 40. My max in pull-ups is about 8-10. My max in sit-ups was at one point 300. Not sure about squats. I can jog as far as I will myself too. I have no access to a gym or machines, but have some weights at home. I have limited access to a pool. I have a bike. I don't want to lift any higher than five pounds so as to not stunt my growth. I will not use steroids or anything like that, and i have loads of homework and other school. What is the best full body workout that I can do every other day that I will not get bored of but will help me get closer to the SEALs? I know this is a tall order, but I don't care if it takes you two years to do this. I just want a good workout.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # Clarence 2011-02-08 04:07
Do push ups. my grandfather was in the army. he can do so many push ups. keep working buddy. try doing as many push ups a day for as many sets a day. try for 1,000 pushups. do chin ups. but dont forget legs. run. condition. use some of the weights you said you had at home. good luck. dont quit.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # LJ 2011-05-24 20:27
i am 17 years old and my life asperation is also to be a US Navy SEAL. however, one of the requirements for this duty is to be a United States Citizen. a green card will not be accepted. look up requirements for being a US Navy SEAL. i could still send you my schedule i use for training. it has helped me in MMA, wrestling, rock climbing, etc.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # state 189 2011-06-03 22:44
hey im 17 fight in MMA, wrestle i actually made it to state and im going for delta force thats my life dream, but could you help me with a web site to find info on body building compitions because i cant find anything
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # highlander1980 2011-07-14 11:05
Hey Matey,
For the military I can say avoid bodybuilding and get out run march and walk for distance and learn to carry weight.
Wrestling and MMA will be fantastic for functional fitness and I always found my gym based assesment easy while I was serving.
Generally on top of the running I would recomend getting good at body weight exercises as these form the basis of your military fitness tests.
Finally I would recomend that you do proprioceptive/balance work to minimise injury risk.
Good luck with you ambition and hope you make it
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+2 # Alexfdsafsdfsdfsdsdf 2011-08-10 17:59
Bluntly I used to use weights and I tried an all bodyweight regimin and got bigger and stronger at a much more substantial rate. Bodyweight can make u strong and big too if you do it right.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+4 # Angel 2011-11-06 20:28
I lifted weights to get a solid base of 215 of powerlifting muscle. I was able to dead almost 400 and benched about 325. Massive monster? No, but I was strong. I decided after a while to switch to calisthenics and I lost 30 pounds pretty quickly, kept the muscle and got ripped. Here is the thing. I never saw myself or thought I was overweight at all. Just a biggish guy to most people (NOT a mass monster, just bigger than most). It was when I started calisthenics that I noticed I did not have much functional strength. I definitely feel a lot more fit and able to tackle the 12 hour a day working life. I don't dissuade anyone from lifting big. It definitely helped me, but once I switched to calisthenics and will likely never switch back to lifting. You have never met someone who can bang out 50 pushups, 15 dips, 15 pull ups and 30 sit ups in a row and then run 2 miles in under 18 who is not fit. Just my personal take. They are not opposed to each other...just different.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # Samson 2011-11-19 15:07
No offense, but I'm seeing an author with skinny arms giving advice on how to acquire muscle.

Body builders use machines to specifically target and "bring up" weak points that free weights have difficulty in reaching.

Machines are not useless and many of the experts in the field would call the Author uniformed and out of his league.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
0 # The Truth 2011-11-19 15:58
Honestly, the author does not even look like he engages in any physical fitness regimen. He is unqualified to give any advice on this topic.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-5 # xraided85 2011-11-20 22:10
Horrible advice. Please quit qorking out and life all together. Machines are used to isolate muscles, just as you said in your article whish IS VERY USEFULL if that is your goal. In bodybuilding we go for proportion, sometimes you need to isolate to acheive that dummy. PS You look like the small animals i eat for breakfast.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # Lol really? 2011-11-20 22:25
Seriously?? I couldn't finish such said article because of my laughter. This guy must be a personal trainer. "Bodyweight exercises are superior for wrestling and other grappling and martial arts, gymnastics, and for those who want to join the armed forces" Hmm Im in the Army and when I enlisted my drill sgt's lifted weights. When I got to my duty station guess what we lifted weights. When I went to Iraq we lifted weights. By the way why don't you ask MMA fighters if they lift weights Im pretty sure they all do. A piece of advice to you guys if he looks scrawny don't listen to his advice
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # Hugh Myrone 2011-11-20 22:26
Does this guy even pick things up and put them down?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-2 # SwagMorris 2011-11-20 22:27
Watch videos of professional bodybuilders and professional athletes training. Plenty of machines being used. I guess they were doing it wrong the whole time. Thanks to the author, for not only saving professional sports, but America.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # nz 2011-11-21 11:28
lol what advise could a skinny guy give about lifting?
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
-3 # Zach 2011-11-21 15:52
This guy is an idiot. Anyone who thought this was a good article knows nothing about lifting, bodybuilding, or how muscles work.
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Kerry Dulin 2011-11-22 02:01
I seriously doubt that many of the people posting negative comments about this article even took the time to read it. For starters, the guy in the top image is stock photo and not the author. Even so,, look at the content of the article itself and not just the image, this article is about the pros and cons of various exercise movements and their applications in the real world. As such this article is geared toward the general fitness enthusiast and not bodybuilders.
Read the article in context!!!
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+1 # Danny 2011-12-02 14:39
Fu*k the bullshit..wanna get ripped,big,and have the strength..then do.weights and calisthenics at the same time this will make you a beast..end of discussion
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 
 
+3 # Mack1992 2012-01-07 04:33
Hardcore bodyweight training=beast
Heavy lifting=beast
Reply | Reply with quote | Quote
 

Add comment

Anyone can post comments however comments will be moderated if you are not a registered member.


Security code
Refresh